第一篇：英语辩论：经济发展与环境保护那个优先？正方四辩陈词

Honorable judges, guests, ladies and gentlemen,Anyway, The proposed arguments lead us to the obvious conclusion that economic growth should receive the priority in China.Firstly,China is a developing country with a large population,we must attach enough importance to economic development so that we can make sure of people's living conditions.In the primitive society, human ancestor`s environmental protection work is good,should we return to this kind of life according to your meaning?

Secondly,Economy development first does not mean totally ignore the environmental protection,the economic development will definitely pay the price, however,we have the structure of sustainable development,which can make the price to the least.The most important,only when we give priority to the development of economy, can we have the technology, capital and other supports for solving the environmental problems.A very simple data, China spent at least 580 billion yuan on the environmental protection,only the expenditure of the central government.without the fast growth of economy,from which you can get such enormous sum of money ?

In summery,the simple truth is :It is economic growth ,but not environmental protection ,should receive priority in China.

第二篇：英语辩论正方总结陈词

Which teaching and learning style is more beneficial to college students, student-centered or teacher-centered?

For summary, we do believe that student-centered style is more beneficial to our study.As mentioned above, the college learning method is totally different and unique.We have to do all the staff ourselves and think on our own, which means we college students need more freedom.In addition, this very style has a lot of advantages, for example, it brings us creativity, practical mind and curiosity.In conclusion, the student-centered style is what we actually need.Is it a good idea for a young couple to live together with parents after marriage?

For summary, we do believe that it is definitely a good idea for a young couple to live together with their parents.To start with, that is really a wonderful way to care for the parents and share the sweet love with them.Only if we live together can we and our parents help each other.That will do good to the family life.Secondly, as what Confucius told us, we should never be far away from the parents.That is what we call Filial Duty.In addition, any trouble could be solved if we like to.So it is obvious that the advantages are more dominant.Is it a good choice for college graduates to start their own business when it is hard to hunt a satisfactory job?

For summary, we do believe that it is a definitely a wonderful idea for graduates to start their own business instead of hunting job.Because that is an effective way to accelerate the economy and improve our society.Starting own business can give us a chance to dig out our capacity and improve ourselves.Though there is a lot of risk, we still need to fight for that and that will be our direct path to success.And our government encourages graduates to start own business as a power to our development.There are many current policies we can apply.In this way, it is a good shot to start own business.Should the young generation live on the wealth accumulated by parents when they grow up into adults?

For summary, we do believe that young generation is supposed to live on the wealth accumulated by parents when they grow up into adults.Anyway, there are many negative sayings about this phenomenon at current times.They are looked down upon by the mass and called FU ER DAI.Their success and behavior are judged because of their original capital.But what we should neglect is that they have more chances to succeed.And there are many paths to Rome, which means that is possible and normal.In a word ,if you can get your original capital from your parents, take it and try to do something and pay them back.Whether telling the truth is always the best policy in any circumstances or not?

For summary, we do believe that telling the truth is always the best choice in any circumstances.There is no doubt it is wrong and incorrect to tell a lie and we are sure that everyone was ever blamed for telling lies.In this way, we should do the right thing and never tell a lie.Some people talk about white lies, which they say can give a chance to make things better.But we have always been taught to be a person with principle.If you can always do the right thing, you will get respect and be honest and loyal.That is exactly what we should persue.Whether the number of private cars should be restricted in big cities or not?

For summary, we do believe that the number of private cars should be restricted , especially in big cities, where the air condition is in seriously bad condition.As we all know, our government has carried out a lot of policies to limit the private cars.That is because the large number of private cars has resulted in many troubles, such as traffic jams and air pollutions.It is urgent to make some change about the private cars, and the number restriction is a great shot.Though we cannot force people’s consumption behavior, yet every of us has responsibility for our social health.Less cars, greener world.

第三篇：英语辩论环境保护与经济发展

Which should receive priority in china? Environmental protection or economic growth.：Good morning everyone!We are here now debating about whether environmental protection or

economic growth should take priority in china;we think its economy growth should be chosen.I have three reasons to prove this point.：First, as a developing country, the economy power is far behind the developed countries, so the urgent

affair of china is to develop our economy.：Second, Economy growth doesn’t necessarily conflict with environment protection.We can develop

our economy without environmental pollution.：Third, when our economy strength become strong, we can spend more money and energy on

environment protection, till then it will be a win-win.In a word, considering the current situations, economy growth should take priority in china.：We agree economic growth is needed.But think about the past decades, we followed the old model of

“first pollution, last treatment”, however, how did it come out? The environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local regions’ environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence.：What’s more, the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much by this means, it placed us in a

completely passive position.At the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life, urban conservation and the environment.：So, we must get to the bottom of the problem and learn from the past, which is to say, in the course of

development, we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority.Only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably.：We all know that in many places of china like many poor countries, where the environment is pretty

good, but there are thousands people lack of money for the food or clothes.Even in the city like Dalian, how many people can’t afford of the expensive price of house.Do you think the problems like these can be solved by environmental protection?

：But opponent debaters can’t ignore the fact that most areas of china have solved the problem of food

and clothing at present.Furthermore, the level of economic development in many cities in eastern china is very high.But the pollution is pretty serious accordingly.We have money, but being under the sub health condition.Does it make any sense, opponent debaters?

：Some eastern cities do exist whose economy is quite developed, but you forget that china has 130

million people.The eastern cities can’t stand for the whole china.We know that environment protection need high-technology, high-tech personnel, and science research.They all need a lot of money, and money is created by economy.I want to ask my fellow debater that can we protect our environment well without strong economy strength.：Environmental protection needs money.But we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth.If you drink polluted water, eat the toxic food, can we have a high quality of life? Economic development must be on the premise of environmental protection.：Economic growth is important, environmental protection is also important.And our government has

already realized the importance of the balance between the two parts, and did achieve some

good results.I think in the future there will be on a win-win situation in the economic and

environmental protection.

第四篇：自由辩论四辩总结陈词

尊敬的评委老师、各位辩友：

综上所述，道德是一种社会意识形态，用以调节人与人之间的利益关系，是人们共同生活及其行为的准则和规范。而制度则是指大家共同遵守的办事规程或行动准则，要求其成员共同遵守并按一定程序办事的规程。

在一个社会中，道德的力量是很强大、很重要的，因为它可以从内在去约束人们的行为，使人们按照公认的标准处事，从而有助于社会的稳定、和谐，它与制度相辅相成，是相互推进的关系。但用道德去治理社会，却存在着明显缺陷，特别是道德对权力的约束是无力的；反过来，权力往往借助制定道德规矩来扩张自身的权势。假设道德能够严厉约束一些人的行为，象陈希同、成克杰、***这样的蛀虫就不会产生。因此，道德与制度相比，道德的作用就会显得苍白无力，如果没有一个好的制度，光靠道德约束很难持久，尤其是对一个握有权力的人来讲，在今天这个“金钱至上，物欲横流”的时代，个人的道德是靠不住的，这是由人的自私、贪欲的本性所决定的，不建立一个相互制约的制度来约束，单靠当权者道德自律是根本靠不住的。

我们要充分认识人性，对人性保持清醒的认识，时刻警惕人性之恶。不要相信任何自诩高尚的人，不要相信任何美丽的承诺，不要对道德自律抱有太大的希望。如果没有制度约束，任何人，包括你和我，拥有权力都有可能会以权谋私，追求满足自己的私欲。为了大家都不受专制、独裁的侵害，为了大家的利益都得到保障，我们需要建立一整套权力与利益相互制约的制度，对每个人都有约束，包括你我，尤其要限制权力，只有制度才能约束人性的贪欲。

当今时弊，就是空谈人性道德，死守中国两千年的道德说教，拒绝制度创新，将一切约束权力肆虐的有效制度，排斥甚至废止。习主席高瞻远瞩，提出了坚决反对形式主义、官僚主义、享乐主义和奢靡之风的“四风”，就是在当前形势下，作出的一项英明决策。只要我们各级领导干部以道德修养为基础，以制度约束为准绳，我们的工作就会越做越好，我们的“中国梦”就一定会实现！

我的陈述完了，谢谢大家！

第五篇：校级辩论四辩总结陈词

尊敬的主席，亲爱的各位朋友，经过刚才的辩论，我们双方的观点已十分明确，谁对谁错，一听便知。首先，我方感谢对方辩友精彩的发言，但是对方词藻的华丽实在是填补不了内容的空洞。现在就由我来指出对方辩友观点的不妥之处，以及论证我方观点的正确性。

一、对方辩友一直偷换概念，妄想把类似于“同辈效应”的心理学强加在学校教育上，以及把学校教育的全面性当作普遍适用青少年的普适性，这样的行为请恕我方不能苟同。同时，站在一个带错帽子的优点上，对方大谈特谈，难道是希望能种瓜得豆吗？而且，对方辩友一再强调学校教育的全面性，却没有看到理想的丰满与现实的骨感之间的差距，没有看到学校教育所谓的全面是脱离现状的。

其次，对方辩友以偏概全、以管窥豹。无视我方已明确在一辩立论中提出的家庭培养和学校教育都具有缺陷，（而对方辩友死死抠住家长不顾孩子意愿把他们送去各种补习班这一事件，）

此外，对方辩友犯了前后矛盾的错误，在立论中提到学校教育具有全面性，却又在陈述过程中说到其具有专业针对性。

二、家庭培养为学校教育提供了基础和前提，脱离家庭教育的学校教育是无本之木、无源之水。家庭成员之间因其血浓于水的关系对孩子的一言一行起着潜移默化、不可比拟的作用。即使家庭教育具有局限性，但与学校教育相比，其缺陷更容易弥补。根据整体与部分的哲学理论，学校教育作为一个大整体，其应试教育的弊端不可能轻易地被改变，而家庭教育在这点上更具灵活性。此外，家庭言传身教的方式以及家庭培养针对性、基础性、情感性等特点对于正处于青春期的青少年素质的提高更具优势。

三、青少年作为祖国的未来，民族的希望，整个社会乃至国家对其十分重视，我们应该以家庭为核心，以学校为支撑，以社会为体系，大力提高青少年的全面素质，推动社会之发展，共创民族之兴旺。放眼人类文明，纵观华夏几千年的家庭培养，修身、齐家、治国、平天下一直是贯穿其中的精神真谛。它积淀出慈孝互动的亲近，培养出敬长奉养的德行，陶冶出律己仁人的情怀，折射出爱怜憎斥的明辨。越是民族的就越是世界的！

慈母手中线，游子身上衣。妄想脱离家庭培养，而只谈学校教育，这无疑在父母的心上狠狠地剜了一刀。对方辩友的铿锵陈述难道不正是甩了父母一耳光，抽了社会一鞭子，捅了国家一匕首吗？实在让人心寒！我方坚决呼吁让家庭、社会、学校的教育共创辉煌的明天！

我方观点陈述完毕，谢谢！